
The Story · The founder
Dr. Pat Benz,
PhD
Chemist. Pilot. Inventor. Sailor. In that order.
The scientist
Materials that
restored sight
An organic chemist by training, Patrick H. Benz founded Benz Research and Development in 1983.
By 1989 a third of the world’s soft contact lenses were made from its materials. By the time he sold the company in 2021, its polymers had become some 80 million intraocular lenses, restoring sight to cataract patients around the world.
He holds more than 25 U.S. and 100 foreign patents. One of his lens materials held water so well that it never dried out on the eye. He called it Extreme H2O.
- Founded BRD
- 1983
- Patents
- 125+
- 25 U.S. · 100 foreign
- Intraocular lenses
- 80M+
- Made from his materials
- Soft lenses, 1989
- 1 in 3
- Worldwide
“People look at me and say, “Wow, he must be really a sailor.” No. I’m a scientist.”

The pilot
Gliders, gyroplanes
and seaplanes
Pat flies gliders, gyroplanes and seaplanes for the joy of it, and it shows in the way he approaches a boat. PB72 is a yacht treated as an aerodynamics problem: lift, drag, weight and control.
Sailing runs in the family. His grandfather, Patrick Houston Wall, was a Tampa sailing pioneer who won the St. Petersburg–Havana race and flew biplanes in the 1920s. Pat’s own first boat was a Super Cat 17 he sailed alone off Sarasota. It was “really fun to go that fast, that easily.”

The owner
An experiment,
not a trophy
Pat sold the original Extreme H2O because, as he put it, there was nothing left to learn. PB72 exists because there was, and because he wanted to find out himself, at full scale, on the open ocean.
He is open about wanting to share the result. The design can be built again, and the molds are waiting in Italy. If PB72 proves what the numbers say, it could be the beginning of a whole new class of flying cats.
In his own words
Why I built
PB72
From Dr. Pat Benz’s handwritten account, “Why I built PB72, or Extreme H2O 2.0”. Lightly edited.
What is a PhD organic chemist who doesn’t really sail doing building a 72-foot catamaran that actually flies over the water, at speeds never seen before in an ocean-going catamaran?
It started with a half-finished Gunboat 66. Gunboat went bankrupt in 2014 with the boat only half completed, and I brought her back to California, to Morrelli & Melvin, who were the original designers of the Gunboat 66. She came down the 405 at two in the morning to a small boatyard in Costa Mesa. She had no daggerboards or mast yet, so after many discussions with M&M I decided to make big alterations. I wanted a big wing mast and a large C-foil instead of a straight daggerboard.
With a tall wing mast and a large C-foil we were doing 23 to 25 knots fairly easily, and our maximum speed was measured at 31 knots. In 2015 we were the first catamaran to finish the Transpac and won the Rudy Choy Trophy. I didn’t sail her; I was on board as the cook, which I love to do, and the professional crew loved my cooking as well. She was very comfortable too, with a full galley, hot showers, real beds, an automatic espresso machine and even air-conditioning. With all that, we were still the first catamaran to finish.
That boat showed me the limits of having a single board do two completely different jobs: leeway and lift. From 3 to 12 knots of boat speed the C-board was slightly worse than a straight centreboard. From about 13 to 22 knots it performed well, and at 23 to 25 knots its lift fraction was about 30%. As we went faster, the C-foil pulled the boat to windward, and that made the helm a difficult job.
Several years later, after I had sold the original Extreme H2O, I met Pete Melvin and Ferdinand van West at an Italian restaurant in Sarasota. I asked if they would be interested in a complete redesign: a boat correctly balanced for speed, but keeping all the comfort of the original. That was the beginning of PB72. The design, and all the thought that went into it, is what I really enjoyed.
To balance the boat and keep the same saloon, she had to be 72 feet, with the mast moved back to the top of the roof. She needed to be wider, with a waterline close to 72 feet, and the entire boat had to be carbon and Nomex. Then we talked about foils. No one except me wanted two boards per side; the complaints were that it was too complicated and too heavy. I insisted. I wanted to separate the two forces: one horizontal, to windward, for leeway, and the other vertical, for lift.
At first she was designed for 50% lift, and everyone but me thought that would be the limit for control. We continued. M&M and North Sails used an interactive program to “sail” the boat in six degrees of freedom. It was very costly to run and took time to produce the data. When we reached a 50% lift fraction the boat was stable in the program, so I wanted more. It felt like I was spending $100,000 for every 10 to 15% of lift fraction, until we reached 90%. Then we went for 100%, and she appeared stable in calm water. But it became clear that the most stable condition is just skimming the water, at 80 to 90% lift, depending on the waves.
The result is a righting-moment foil that can lift the entire boat, working from a point five to six feet to leeward. The boat stays almost level at these speeds, which the program shows exceeding 40 knots. As well as two foils per side, we adjust her attitude like an aeroplane, with large T-foil rudders on conical titanium bearings that let each rudder move fore and aft to bring the bow up or down. There is nothing forward, because at these speeds the sheets and the crew need to be back behind the roof.
In her first and second sea trials she has shown what she can do: 27 knots in 11 to 12 knots of wind at 110 degrees, 38 knots in 18 knots of wind at 130 degrees, and 39 knots in 20 knots of wind at 85 degrees.
We designed an open-ocean catamaran faster than any other catamaran.
Dr. Pat Benz
“It could be a whole new class of flying cats.”
Private enquiries
PB72 is in sea trials. Partnerships, racing programs, experiences and charter are discussed personally with our team.
Extreme H2O · Foiling ocean catamaran · Technical specification
PB72 specifications
Morrelli & Melvin · GA PB72_001 Rev A · Persico Marine build spec
- Length overall
- 21.95 m
- 72.0 ft
- Beam
- 9.50 m
- 31.2 ft
- Racing displacement
- ≈ 21.5 t
- As built · VPP targets at 20.3 t
- Mast
- 32.33 m
- Air draft 37 m
- Upwind sail area
- 420 m²
- Main 224 + J1 196
- Fastest upwind
- J3 + main
- Full main 224 + J3 115 m²
- Fastest downwind
- MHO + main
- Full main 224 + MHO 358 m²
- Predicted top speed
- 40+ kn
- VPP
Principal dimensions
- Length overall
- 21.95 m72.0 ft
- Length incl. longeron
- 24.10 m79.1 ft
- Length waterline
- 21.45 m70.4 ft
- Beam overall
- 9.50 m31.2 ft
- Hull centreline spacing
- 7.52 m24.7 ft
- Freeboard
- 2.07 m6.8 ft
- Draft, boards down
- 5.31 m17.4 ft
- Draft, foils raised
- 0.65 m2.1 ft
- Air draft
- 37.00 m121.4 ft
Displacement & stability
- Light displacement
- ≈ 21,000 kgAs built · design 20,500 kg
- Racing displacement
- ≈ 21,500 kgAs built · as sailed in sea trials
- VPP target displacement
- 20,280 kgDesign racing weight used for the polar targets
- Design displacement (mLDC)
- 23,047 kgMaximum load condition
- Max total load (ISO 8666)
- 22,518 kg
- Steady-state sailing RM
- 830 kNmAt full-payload displacement
- Max dynamic RM
- 1,340 kNmRace mode, RMFoil deployed
Rig
- Mast tube length
- 32.33 m106.1 ft
- Mast design rake
- 4°
- P
- 31.285 mReefs: 26.604 · 21.970 · 14.190 m
- E
- 9.678 m
- I (1 · 2 · 3)
- 33.470 · 32.775 · 30.900 m
- I headstay (5 · 6)
- 28.050 · 25.720 m
- J (1 · 2 · 3)
- 12.180 · 11.730 · 10.980 m
- J headstay (5 · 6)
- 8.744 · 8.072 m
- BAD · HBI
- 1.906 · 2.019 m
Sail areas
- Mainsail, full
- 224 m²Reefs: 183 · 144 · 76.8 m²
- J0
- 219 m²
- J1
- 196 m²
- J3
- 115 m²
- J4 / staysail
- 87.3 m²
- FRO
- 304 m²
- MHO
- 358 m²
- A1
- 365 m²
- Fastest upwind setup
- J3 + full mainJ1 in marginal upwind conditions, 13–14 kn: partial foiling
- Fastest downwind setup
- MHO + full main
Foils & flight control
- Righting-moment foil
- ≈ 16 × 3 ftCurved carbon foil in a hydraulically raked case
- Daggerboards
- Centreline, per hullIndependent of the lifting foil
- Rudders
- Raking, T-foilConical titanium bearings · ≈ 6 ft T-foils
- Flight control
- Designed for fly-by-wireFoil lift and rudder-elevator control; programmed after sea trials
Construction & class
- Hull
- Carbon fibreFoam & Nomex sandwich
- Superstructure
- Carbon fibreFoam & Nomex sandwich
- Classification
- ISO 12215-7 Cat. ASER1 multihull · highest category, sport boat
- Propulsion
- 2 × 35 kW electricTorqeedo
Rig & deck hardware
- Mast
- Carbon rotating wing mastSupplied by SSNZ · single spreader, double diamond, running backstays
- Primary winches
- 4 × Harken 1125.3
- Secondary winches
- 2 × Harken 65.3 ST
- Windlass
- Lewmar V6 hydraulic
Propulsion & power
- Main engines
- 2 × Torqeedo electric25 kW continuous · 35 kW max each
- Drive
- Shaft driveStrut and P-bracket · Gori GP20 folding propellers
- Motoring speed
- 9.2 kn max7.5 kn cruise (estimated)
- Generators
- 2 × 20 kW Fischer Panda
- Propulsion battery
- 40 kWh lithium-ionBMW i3 cells
- Solar
- 2 kWPanels on the coachroof
- Electrical
- 120 V and 240 V AC400 V DC charging & hydraulic bus · 24 V domestic · Empirbus digital switching
Tankage
- Fuel
- 2 × 550 L
- Fresh water
- 2 × 450 LPlus 70 L drinking water
- Watermaker
- Schenker Modular Zen 50
- Black water
- 2 × 220 L
Comfort & systems
- Air conditioning
- 64,000 BTU/hTermodinamica
- Galley
- Gaggenau hobsPizza oven · Miele microwave · Miele coffee machine
- Refrigeration
- 3 × 172 L fridgesPlus Frigonautica freezer
- Navigation
- B&G / Simrad
- Communications
- VHF · 5G · SatcomSatellite broadband
- Steering
- Outside helms + inside helmFly-by-wire steering at the inside helm station
Performance
- Predicted top speed
- 40+ knPolar peak 40.7 kn
- Foiling onset
- 11–13 kn TWSDepending on sail set
- Upwind, 13 kn of wind
- ≈ 24 kn
- Downwind, 14 kn of wind
- ≈ 31 kn
- Crew
- 4 per watchTo sail her fast; two watches for round-the-clock ocean racing
Velocity prediction program, partially validated in sea trials.
Design & build
- Naval architecture
- Morrelli & MelvinNewport Beach, California
- Lead designer
- Ferdinand van WestThen at Morrelli & Melvin; now Van West Naval Architecture
- Interior architecture
- Design Unlimited
- Builder
- Persico MarineItaly
- Flight control
- Team New Zealand engineers
- General arrangement
- PB72_001 · Rev A6 August 2022

Figures from the Morrelli & Melvin general arrangement (PB72_001, Rev A, August 2022) and the Persico Marine build specification. Displacements are approximate as-built figures from Ferdinand van West (2026); righting moments are design estimates; performance figures are VPP predictions, calculated at the 20,280 kg design racing displacement.
Every cell is a predicted boat speed from the velocity prediction program. The circled cells are the targets PB72 has already hit in her first sea trials, with the foils still trimmed by hand. Each one came in on target.
| Wind angleTrue wind (kn) | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 20 | 22 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45° | 7.6 | 8.4 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 10.4 | 11.3 | 12.6 | 13.6 | 14.4 | 15.1 | 16.0 | 17.4 | 20.5 | 23.4 | 24.0 | 23.7 |
| 50° | 8.0 | 8.9 | 9.7 | 10.5 | 11.2 | 12.8 | 14.3 | 15.1 | 16.3 | 17.6 | 19.5 | 21.6 | 27.1 | 27.5 | 27.0 | 26.5 |
| 55° | 8.4 | 9.3 | 10.2 | 11.2 | 12.2 | 14.2 | 15.7 | 17.0 | 18.8 | 20.8 | 23.4 | 27.6 | 30.1 | 30.2 | 29.5 | 28.9 |
| 60° | 8.8 | 9.7 | 10.7 | 11.8 | 13.2 | 15.3 | 17.1 | 19.3 | 21.5 | 26.1 | 28.6 | 30.2 | 32.4 | 32.3 | 31.6 | 30.9 |
| 65° | 9.1 | 10.1 | 11.2 | 12.3 | 14.3 | 16.4 | 19.1 | 21.5 | 26.1 | 29.0 | 30.8 | 32.2 | 34.3 | 34.2 | 33.4 | 32.4 |
| 70° | 9.3 | 10.4 | 11.5 | 12.7 | 14.9 | 17.9 | 20.9 | 24.1 | 28.6 | 30.8 | 32.4 | 33.8 | 35.8 | 35.7 | 34.8 | 32.3 |
| 75° | 9.5 | 10.6 | 11.8 | 13.1 | 15.4 | 19.4 | 22.6 | 27.3 | 30.2 | 32.2 | 33.7 | 35.1 | 37.1 | 37.1 | 36.2 | 34.0 |
| 80° | 9.7 | 11.0 | 12.3 | 13.9 | 15.8 | 20.6 | 25.1 | 28.7 | 31.4 | 33.2 | 34.7 | 36.1 | 38.1 | 38.2 | 37.3 | 36.2 |
| 85° | 9.8 | 11.2 | 12.6 | 14.2 | 16.2 | 21.3 | 26.9 | 29.8 | 32.2 | 34.0 | 35.5 | 36.9 | 39.0 | 39.1 | 38.3 | 37.5 |
| 90° | 9.9 | 11.3 | 12.7 | 14.4 | 16.4 | 21.5 | 27.7 | 31.5 | 33.5 | 35.1 | 36.3 | 37.5 | 39.6 | 39.8 | 39.1 | 38.7 |
| 95° | 9.9 | 11.3 | 12.8 | 14.4 | 16.5 | 21.0 | 28.7 | 31.7 | 33.9 | 35.5 | 36.8 | 37.9 | 40.0 | 40.3 | 39.8 | 39.5 |
| 100° | 9.9 | 11.3 | 12.7 | 14.2 | 16.3 | 22.3 | 28.8 | 31.7 | 34.2 | 35.8 | 37.0 | 38.1 | 40.3 | 40.6 | 40.3 | 40.0 |
| 105° | 9.8 | 11.1 | 12.5 | 14.0 | 15.7 | 21.0 | 28.3 | 31.4 | 34.0 | 35.8 | 37.1 | 38.2 | 40.3 | 40.7 | 40.5 | 40.3 |
| 110° | 9.7 | 10.9 | 12.2 | 13.6 | 15.1 | 17.7 | 26.8 | 31.0 | 33.3 | 35.5 | 37.0 | 38.2 | 40.2 | 40.7 | 40.6 | 40.4 |
| 115° | 9.5 | 10.6 | 11.8 | 13.1 | 14.5 | 16.5 | 19.9 | 30.0 | 32.6 | 34.8 | 36.6 | 37.9 | 40.0 | 40.3 | 40.4 | 40.1 |
| 120° | 9.2 | 10.3 | 11.4 | 12.5 | 13.7 | 14.9 | 17.4 | 25.8 | 31.8 | 34.0 | 35.6 | 37.4 | 39.6 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 39.6 |
| 125° | 8.9 | 9.9 | 10.8 | 11.6 | 12.4 | 13.5 | 14.7 | 16.3 | 29.7 | 32.9 | 34.9 | 36.4 | 39.0 | 39.6 | 39.6 | 39.1 |
| 130° | 8.5 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 10.8 | 11.9 | 13.1 | 14.3 | 15.5 | 17.1 | 18.0 | 33.4 | 35.4 | 38.1 | 38.9 | 39.1 | 38.6 |
| 135° | 8.2 | 8.7 | 9.5 | 10.5 | 11.5 | 12.6 | 13.7 | 14.8 | 16.2 | 17.3 | 18.4 | 20.0 | 37.0 | 38.0 | 38.2 | 37.7 |
| 140° | 7.6 | 8.2 | 9.1 | 9.9 | 10.9 | 11.9 | 12.9 | 14.0 | 15.2 | 16.4 | 17.7 | 19.1 | 22.1 | 35.4 | 30.7 | 35.0 |
Predicted speeds from the velocity prediction program. Sea-trial targets achieved with manual foil trim; the automatic flight-control system comes online after calibration.
- VPP targets calculated at
- 20,280 kg
- Design racing displacement
- Sea trials sailed at
- ≈ 21,500 kg
- As-built racing displacement
Every circled target was reached with the boat about 1.2 tonnes heavier than the weight the predictions assume.